Clinton, because when BILL was in there it was the BEST 8 YEARS this country had ever saw from an economic stand point, dont beleive me go look at the figures.
believe it or not he is the reason why we have been in Iraq so long, he cut military spending resulting in our military not being completely ready for war. the first war in the Gulf lasted 4 days of fighting because our military was so well prepared. selecting another democrat would not make and damn since to me in that case. McCain....
plus the only president that has been a democrat in my lifetime was a sneak who was not even a war veteran (bush wasn't either) but i want a strong military and i want welfare cut down. i don't want to have to pay my money for other people to be lazy.
__________________
PS2 GT= AIDS TOUGH- banned now back to KOTC GUSH
360 GT= GUSH ON YOU
believe it or not he is the reason why we have been in Iraq so long, he cut military spending resulting in our military not being completely ready for war. the first war in the Gulf lasted 4 days of fighting because our military was so well prepared. selecting another democrat would not make and damn since to me in that case. McCain....
plus the only president that has been a democrat in my lifetime was a sneak who was not even a war veteran (bush wasn't either) but i want a strong military and i want welfare cut down. i don't want to have to pay my money for other people to be lazy.
military spending is the reason our economy is in the ****ter...someone whos smart enough to avoid unnecessary wars that eat up all our money and have our young men killed and injured will be better for the country
__________________
Human Crack in the Flesh. Im the last of the best. One word to describe me? Spectacular, Yes.
Xbox GT: THEFRIDGE420
military spending is the reason our economy is in the ****ter...someone whos smart enough to avoid unnecessary wars that eat up all our money and have our young men killed and injured will be better for the country
we are unprepared you **** head or else we would have lost a couple hundred and got the **** out of there after stomping on them Al-Queda ****s. just look what happened when we went to war after RR was president with big Bush. We were prepared so we dominated a top 5 army in the world in 4 days. yeah that was nice, and now we need to just rebound with a strong military personality or we can get ransacked by those pig ****ers. no thanks i don't want to be a pussy nation like France and i want to be ready for anything that comes our way. Think what you want but thats what i think and my explanation.
__________________
PS2 GT= AIDS TOUGH- banned now back to KOTC GUSH
360 GT= GUSH ON YOU
we are unprepared you **** head or else we would have lost a couple hundred and got the **** out of there after stomping on them Al-Queda ****s. just look what happened when we went to war after RR was president with big Bush. We were prepared so we dominated a top 5 army in the world in 4 days. yeah that was nice, and now we need to just rebound with a strong military personality or we can get ransacked by those pig ****ers. no thanks i don't want to be a pussy nation like France and i want to be ready for anything that comes our way. Think what you want but thats what i think and my explanation.
first off our military is plenty strong...no one wants it with us, we are the most powerful country in the world by far.
fighting a war on terrorism aint exactly that simple....we could have one tenth the power of our army and we would still be plenty strong to go into the middle east and run **** but when youre fighting against guerillas and terrorists it dont really make much difference how powerful your army is.
__________________
Human Crack in the Flesh. Im the last of the best. One word to describe me? Spectacular, Yes.
Xbox GT: THEFRIDGE420
first off our military is plenty strong...no one wants it with us, we are the most powerful country in the world by far.
fighting a war on terrorism aint exactly that simple....we could have one tenth the power of our army and we would still be plenty strong to go into the middle east and run **** but when youre fighting against guerillas and terrorists it dont really make much difference how powerful your army is.
yes it does! if we would have had more money invested in our military in the first place we would know a lot more about the military tactics of them Iraq punks. i don't know how old you are or anything but the only democrat president that i have ever seen out of America was a soft anti war punk that had business belonging in the office so my views might be a little biased. go ahead and point out a president that had another president before him be a republican and got absolutely no where as far as a military standpoint. justify what i have written in bold with proof, and maybe i can see where you are coming from.
by the way "pretty strong" is not where we need to be. . .
__________________
PS2 GT= AIDS TOUGH- banned now back to KOTC GUSH
360 GT= GUSH ON YOU
yes it does! if we would have had more money invested in our military in the first place we would know a lot more about the military tactics of them Iraq punks. i don't know how old you are or anything but the only democrat president that i have ever seen out of America was a soft anti war punk that had business belonging in the office so my views might be a little biased. go ahead and point out a president that had another president before him be a republican and got absolutely no where as far as a military standpoint. justify what i have written in bold with proof, and maybe i can see where you are coming from.
by the way "pretty strong" is not where we need to be. . .
if i could understand what ur dumb redneck ass was saying id be able to respond to it
and pretty strong is just a figure of speech, we have by far the strongest military in the world, we dont need to invest more in that. we got plenty bigger problems right at home
__________________
Human Crack in the Flesh. Im the last of the best. One word to describe me? Spectacular, Yes.
Xbox GT: THEFRIDGE420
we are unprepared you **** head or else we would have lost a couple hundred and got the **** out of there after stomping on them Al-Queda ****s. just look what happened when we went to war after RR was president with big Bush. We were prepared so we dominated a top 5 army in the world in 4 days. yeah that was nice, and now we need to just rebound with a strong military personality or we can get ransacked by those pig ****ers. no thanks i don't want to be a pussy nation like France and i want to be ready for anything that comes our way. Think what you want but thats what i think and my explanation.
The war right now has little to do with al-quaeda the government not gonna reveal the real reasons obviously, we need t gtfo of the middle east before everybody goes all out on us.... blowback and effects of this war will eat us in the end no matter what, ppl dont like us because america sticks their nose in everything < that is backed up by this fact -
between 95 and 04... 2/3'rds of all al quaeda attacks have been in countries america have troops stationed... until the usa invasion of iraq in 03, iraq never had a suicide terrorist attack in the entire history... between 82 and 86 there were 41 suicide attacks in lebanon, once the usa and france withdrew their troops, there were no more attacks... since the invasion of iraq al quaeda recruitment is increasing everyday....... it doesnt take a genious to see that al-quaeda can motivate ppl using this ... whereas if we weren there they couldnt.... besides do we have any money to fund the war???? a war that is in no way a threat to our national security..... some ppl need to read the constitution b/c our politicians are forgetting that ****
i wanna bea ble to get high as ****, **** bitches, get a **** load of money, play madden in harmony into my later days but how am i gonna do that and **** comon
that was just a general statement really unprovoked by the way i just had to get that out... which is why i would vote for whoever gonna get out of the war also known as not john mccain
1. Why do we need to focus on military strenght? When we have the strongest military by far.
2. We did not need to go to IRAQ in the first place.
3. Its a proven FACT (look at the numbers) when we have a Democratic Pres. our ECONOMY runs so much smoother.
But screw this, im not getting into a Political debate on a damn message board, i have stated facts.
B. Clinton: 600 Billion in the clear.
G. Bush: 80 Billion in dept.
Quote:
believe it or not he is the reason why we have been in Iraq so long, he cut military spending resulting in our military not being completely ready for war. the first war in the Gulf lasted 4 days of fighting because our military was so well prepared. selecting another democrat would not make and damn since to me in that case. McCain....
plus the only president that has been a democrat in my lifetime was a sneak who was not even a war veteran (bush wasn't either) but i want a strong military and i want welfare cut down. i don't want to have to pay my money for other people to be lazy.
why should we even be in the war we are in now, why do we even need war, and you say we wouldnt focused on military then?.....G. Bush has spent over BILLIONS AND BILLIONS of dollars on a war that DONT MEAN A DAMN THING, ..... and the whole welfare thing, IF THERE ARE JOBS THEN PEOPLLE WILL NOT NEED WELFARE, and BILLIONS OF JOBS HAVE BEEN CUT SINCE BUSH HAS BEEN IN THERE....
by i could go on and on about politics, my dad says i'd make a great politician or lawyer, because i can argue my points real well......
anyhow im done with this thread because it will and already has turned into one big flame war....
__________________
PS2 Gamertag: M0SS ON YOU
360 Gamertag:
lets just remember bill clinton WANTED to go over into Iraq, along with the rest of his cabinet, but he just didnt have the balls to do it. He started the whole invading Iraq, and after 9/11, bush pulled the trigger. The Dems were all about it prior to Bush coming in, check their votes on the war. Now, because its popular to oppose the war, go figure, the Dems all of a sudden are against it...hmmm
__________________
GT: xStickyBudz420x
Badger State Ballerz members-
dragracer18
Drag RacerJX73
Milwaukee
eckohb
"I'm probably high in a different zone, but when I'm off, we can get it on"
If they keep it up, there is going to be a civil war in this country over this economy...Other countries are laughing at us because we have spent so much money and had so many soldiers killed. What do we have to show for it, nothing. Its not about being a puzzy country, its about being a smart and effiecient country with proper leadership, we have neither.
President Bush basically said, I do what the fuk I want, and you suffer, too bad 4 u. I'm amazed at states in the Union who vote republican, but are broke az shyt and have poor economies and budgets.
1. Why do we need to focus on military strenght? When we have the strongest military by far.
2. We did not need to go to IRAQ in the first place.
3. Its a proven FACT (look at the numbers) when we have a Democratic Pres. our ECONOMY runs so much smoother.
But screw this, im not getting into a Political debate on a damn message board, i have stated facts.
B. Clinton: 600 Billion in the clear.
G. Bush: 80 Billion in dept.
why should we even be in the war we are in now, why do we even need war, and you say we wouldnt focused on military then?.....G. Bush has spent over BILLIONS AND BILLIONS of dollars on a war that DONT MEAN A DAMN THING, ..... and the whole welfare thing, IF THERE ARE JOBS THEN PEOPLLE WILL NOT NEED WELFARE, and BILLIONS OF JOBS HAVE BEEN CUT SINCE BUSH HAS BEEN IN THERE....
by i could go on and on about politics, my dad says i'd make a great politician or lawyer, because i can argue my points real well......
anyhow im done with this thread because it will and already has turned into one big flame war....
Bravo...to add to that, Im losing my job in 6 weeks, aint that a bytch.